Huh? In order to conduct an investigation, you question people who may have knowledge of the thing you are investigating. In this case, the president release a summary of the transcript of the call and he admitted he ask the president of Ukraine to find dirt on Joe Biden. This is illegal. He mentioned many other people in reference to this including William Barr, Rudy Giuliani and Kurt Volker. Pompeo was present at the phone call. Do you agree that a good investigation would question all of these people about the missing two thirds of the phone call that wasn’t in the summary?Depends on the evidence.
President* says it’s fake news he asked for dirt on Biden, stands on WH lawn today and says Ukraine and China should investigate Biden. This is a president* who has the world’s best intelligence services at his disposal, but simply doesn’t like what they have told him.
You are so welcome. Just doing my part to help rid the country of this Corrupt Conniving Crooked Compromised Coercive Creep.Dude, you are crazily obsessed with Trump. Thank you for the daily/hourly play by play.
I think it's both informative and entertaining.Dude, you are crazily obsessed with Trump. Thank you for the daily/hourly play by play.
I'm going to expound on my own comment. Would Trump be doing this if it were for anything other than self-interest? No f****ng way.I don't know if it's illegal, but I think it's highly improper for a president to make a declaration of guilt without the slightest presentation of evidence or semblance of due process. I certainly don't think it's in his job description.
Everything we need to know is in the transcript, making any whistleblower bias irrelevant.Maybe because of DOJ findings.
Justice Department memo says whistleblower has "some indicia of an arguable political bias" — but the complaint was credible
From CNN's Katelyn Polantz