• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Welcome to America

New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Depends on the evidence.
Huh? In order to conduct an investigation, you question people who may have knowledge of the thing you are investigating. In this case, the president release a summary of the transcript of the call and he admitted he ask the president of Ukraine to find dirt on Joe Biden. This is illegal. He mentioned many other people in reference to this including William Barr, Rudy Giuliani and Kurt Volker. Pompeo was present at the phone call. Do you agree that a good investigation would question all of these people about the missing two thirds of the phone call that wasn’t in the summary?
 
President* says it’s fake news he asked for dirt on Biden, stands on WH lawn today and says Ukraine and China should investigate Biden. This is a president* who has the world’s best intelligence services at his disposal, but simply doesn’t like what they have told him.

Edit: During press briefing today Gym Jordan seems to suddenly have nothing more to say when informed of president’s* outburst on WH lawn.
 
Last edited:
President* says it’s fake news he asked for dirt on Biden, stands on WH lawn today and says Ukraine and China should investigate Biden. This is a president* who has the world’s best intelligence services at his disposal, but simply doesn’t like what they have told him.

Dude, you are crazily obsessed with Trump. Thank you for the daily/hourly play by play.
 
I always find it humorous to watch Trump in these predicaments. He reminds me of a co-worker or employee that is caught in a situation where there were some lies or untruths. 90% of the time the employee will say, "I didn't do that etc...." and they say it one time and get on with their day. They are probably telling the truth. It is the 10% of the time that the deny multiple times, camp out at your office,, or try to rally support from coworkers, then you know that they absolutely are full of s**t. Trump had 80+ tweets over the weekend about the whistleblower et al. Repeat the lie enough and it becomes fact.
 
I don't know if it's illegal, but I think it's highly improper for a president to make a declaration of guilt without the slightest presentation of evidence or semblance of due process. I certainly don't think it's in his job description.
 
I don't know if it's illegal, but I think it's highly improper for a president to make a declaration of guilt without the slightest presentation of evidence or semblance of due process. I certainly don't think it's in his job description.
I'm going to expound on my own comment. Would Trump be doing this if it were for anything other than self-interest? No f****ng way.
 
Maybe because of DOJ findings.
Justice Department memo says whistleblower has "some indicia of an arguable political bias" — but the complaint was credible
From CNN's Katelyn Polantz
Everything we need to know is in the transcript, making any whistleblower bias irrelevant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top