I understand. I think the House won’t delay the trial indefinitely, but once the president* is “acquitted”, there is absolutely nothing left to stop him from rigging the 2020 elections. He will have free reign to get all the assistance he needs from any countries he chooses. Russia should be able to funnel unlimited amounts of money and cyber assets. What is there left to stop him?But nominating someone to a position is not the same as a "trial".....
I understand. I think the House won’t delay the trial indefinitely, but once the president* is “acquitted”, there is absolutely nothing left to stop him from rigging the 2020 elections. He will have free reign to get all the assistance he needs from any countries he chooses. Russia should be able to funnel unlimited amounts of money and cyber assets. What is there left to stop him?
I was just reading that.... the Democrats own impeachment witness from Harvard Law said that there is no impeachment right now. They have to send it to the Senate first. So all these people celebrating his impeachment are getting ahead of themselves. Sounds like Pelosi might be holding on to try to get Trump to do her bidding. Kinda sounds like blackmail to me.Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
Trump Isn’t Impeached Until the House Tells the Senate
According to the Constitution, impeachment is a process, not a vote.
You Leftists screw up everything you touch: health care, California, Chicago, South Florida, "Impeachment". You all can't even get your participation trophy impeachment right. Keep it up! Trump's poll numbers are climbing..![]()
I subscribe to some, but you are the undisputed Conspiracy King on this forum.
![]()
Obviously the same rules and procedures don't apply to the President when it comes to disciplining him. Anyone who has been paying attention for the last couple of years has had that explained ad nauseum. For one, it turns out he really could shoot someone on 5th avenue and continue to serve as president. Impeachment and removal is the only means of addressing a president's illegal activity. If he were subject to the reaches of our standard legal system, Mueller would have indicted him. Anyhow, with impeachment, the rules are different. The burden of proof is much lower. Unanimous verdicts are not necessary. In other words, it's an apples to oranges comparison.I just have one question......if "the president is not above the law" and this "impeachment" is basically a trial....doesnt he have just as much right to a "speedy trial" as anyone else? I am pretty sure if I broke the law, the state prosecutor is limited in what he can ask for if he doesnt like the judge. They cant just defer prosecution (deny me a speedy trial) until the judge dies or something.
I was just reading that.... the Democrats own impeachment witness from Harvard Law said that there is no impeachment right now. They have to send it to the Senate first. So all these people celebrating his impeachment are getting ahead of themselves. Sounds like Pelosi might be holding on to try to get Trump to do her bidding. Kinda sounds like blackmail to me.