Our supreme court has interpreted the 2nd amendment the same way more than a few times. Our citizenry has a right to own guns and therefore that right is not going to change. So can we effect these mass shootings with more regulation of guns? That is what we should be researching, debating and talking about. Of course I believe that we should regulate or ban assault weapons but without a better understanding of the mental elements of mass shootings then it will always be a part of society. Each mass shooting usually leads back to a white male who has been rejected or dismissed by society is some form. Of course not all white males have that mental inability to handle rejection but how do we decide who is a risk? Guess who has always owned all the power in all societies from the beginning of time? In each case there are indicators of behavior that suggest risk. As a society we are going to have to determine that risk and keep weapons of mass shootings out of their possession. I do not believe in extreme positions on this issue but I do believe that we have to give a lot more effort in stopping these mass shootings and it will take a lot of money to regulate this risk to society. We should ban assault weapons and place even more tax on gun purchases. Yes it has a ring of infringement on our Constitutional rights but in the end life comes down to accepting that we humans are flawed and we have to manage those flaws with laws...