S seacrestkristi Beach Fanatic Dec 26, 2007 #2 So people now don't have to pay taxes on the amount that was forgiven if it was their primary residence? Seems logical, I guess. What do you think?
So people now don't have to pay taxes on the amount that was forgiven if it was their primary residence? Seems logical, I guess. What do you think?
wrobert Beach Fanatic Dec 26, 2007 #4 seacrestkristi said: So people now don't have to pay taxes on the amount that was forgiven if it was their primary residence? Seems logical, I guess. What do you think? Click to expand... Does that not just seem an interesting way to avoid paying taxes?
seacrestkristi said: So people now don't have to pay taxes on the amount that was forgiven if it was their primary residence? Seems logical, I guess. What do you think? Click to expand... Does that not just seem an interesting way to avoid paying taxes?
scooterbug44 SoWal Expert Dec 27, 2007 #5 I thought the intent was that they just didn't tax the amount of debt forgiven as "income". So if you made a deal and got a lender/bank to forgive $200,000 in debt, it wasn't going to bite you at tax time as an additional $200k in income. Not that the tax rules ever make sense :roll:.
I thought the intent was that they just didn't tax the amount of debt forgiven as "income". So if you made a deal and got a lender/bank to forgive $200,000 in debt, it wasn't going to bite you at tax time as an additional $200k in income. Not that the tax rules ever make sense :roll:.