Cheering472
SoWal Insider
Yes both parties in Congress were presented the evidence gathered by Bush, then voted to give Bush what he asked for. He asked for a threat to go to war. The vote wasn't for a declaration of war, but was to give Bush the ability to threaten Iraq into compliance. He stated he wanted "teeth" in his warning to Saddam in regards to UN resolutions being carried out. He said we needed to show a strong united front to get him to comply. Congress was told it was the threat of force being approved by them that would keep us safe.
He promised force wasn't the first option, but the very last one and that he would exhaust all means before he took Americans to war. UN inspecters were on the ground in Iraq. Saddam was contained and no new threat against us had occured when Bush took his power, given by Congress as a threat, into actual force.
Make no mistake, Saddam was nasty evil. But if he had the WMD ready that Bush told us we were in immediate danger of, why didn't he use them on us when we invaded? Using that same logic Bush used, we should have already invaded Korea and Iran because they actually do have the ability that Saddam did not
Now everyone has a new playing field. All manner of terrorist groups can now freely move in and around Irag. This was not possible before we removed Saddam, he didn't mind them hating us, but he was in charge. These people can kill our young people in one location and not have to burden themselves with stealing our planes and going far from home. Now I just realized I'm not in the right place to post this. I appear lost. See we all have this directional thing and get turned around. March 2003-should we stay on Osama bin Laden in Afganistan or invade Irag
He promised force wasn't the first option, but the very last one and that he would exhaust all means before he took Americans to war. UN inspecters were on the ground in Iraq. Saddam was contained and no new threat against us had occured when Bush took his power, given by Congress as a threat, into actual force.
Make no mistake, Saddam was nasty evil. But if he had the WMD ready that Bush told us we were in immediate danger of, why didn't he use them on us when we invaded? Using that same logic Bush used, we should have already invaded Korea and Iran because they actually do have the ability that Saddam did not
Now everyone has a new playing field. All manner of terrorist groups can now freely move in and around Irag. This was not possible before we removed Saddam, he didn't mind them hating us, but he was in charge. These people can kill our young people in one location and not have to burden themselves with stealing our planes and going far from home. Now I just realized I'm not in the right place to post this. I appear lost. See we all have this directional thing and get turned around. March 2003-should we stay on Osama bin Laden in Afganistan or invade Irag
