• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

economic boom in 2003

New posts
As for no credibility I agree, thats why I am in the process of learning now. Make no mistake many of your arguments that I am hearing today will be spoken by me to others tomorrow. And to Joe I would say that yes as far as investment purposes it is my belief one could not make a worse investment over time.I am confused how many of you think, having never went to college,I learn from others by throwing things out there. Until last week I had never heard the phrase supply side tax cuts but that does not mean it now does not interest me.
 
Last edited:
:funn:Gold might sleep fairly well, but if I resorted to sleeping on a money filled mattress, I'd have to consider sleeping on copper pennies. ;-)
 
Putting mattresses aside,is it your belief Gen, that a supply side tax cut in a time of war good for the country?
 
As for no credibility I agree, thats why I am in the process of learning now. Make no mistake many of your arguments that I am hearing today will be spoken by me to others tomorrow. And to Joe I would say that yes as far as investment purposes it is my belief one could not make a worse investment over time.I am confused how many of you think, having never went to college,I learn from others by throwing things out there. Until last week I had never heard the phrase supply side tax cuts but that does not mean it now does not interest me.


Glad to help spread the gospel.
 
A creative way to stimulate the economy would be elimination of income tax, combined with a national sales tax. It would stimulate investment from the upper class, and would keep billions in the country currently leaving the economy from illegals. It would discriminate against lower income individuals however.
 
Bob, but won't that make all of the drug dealers and other black market operatives pay taxes? :funn:

There are also ways to not punish the low income people by giving tax credits back. Check out Boortz and Linder's Fair Tax plan. Also, people living in poverty probably should reconsider having luxuries like cable tv, TV's in general, computers, cell phones (although these may be cheaper than a land line if used in moderation), etc. I see many positives from going to the Fair Tax plan which Boortz and Linder are pushing, and hardly any negatives.
 
Last edited:
the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Terrorism causes prosperity? How’s that for an economic theory?

That might not be as far-fetched as it sounds. Many economists believe that wars can trigger economic booms, so why should the war on terrorism be any different?

Could one conclude from the supply sided theory that this goes agaisnt it belief of smaller government. It is my understanding that the classical theory which is where supply sided tax cuts are promoted do not factor a war in its thesis.
 
Last edited:
A creative way to stimulate the economy would be elimination of income tax, combined with a national sales tax. It would stimulate investment from the upper class, and would keep billions in the country currently leaving the economy from illegals. It would discriminate against lower income individuals however.

Completely agree, except potentially on the discrimination part.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top