Welcome to America

[Emerald Drifter]

You lost everyone at Project Veritas.

I knew I would lose Leader of the Lakeview Poppas with the occassional Jenksy, but there are plenty of reader/lurkers on here. Its for them.

It's all CNN employees detailing how obsessed Zucker is with Trump. You would definitely like it.

On a deeper level, it's about a major news organization, a member of the "fourth branch" trying to take down a sitting President.

 

[PoppaJ]

I knew I would lose Leader of the Lakeview Poppas with the occassional Jenksy, but there are plenty of reader/lurkers on here. Its for them.

It's all CNN employees detailing how obsessed Zucker is with Trump. You would definitely like it.

On a deeper level, it's about a major news organization, a member of the "fourth branch" trying to take down a sitting President.

Project Veritas has as much credibility as trump.

 

[Emerald Drifter]

What is ABC News' tagline? "Your Trusted Source"? OK.

Here you can see where ABC has been busted using footage from a semi annual machine gun shootout @ a Kentucky gun range as footage of the Kurds in Syria being "slaughtered". Lazy, lying, arrogant MSM wimps get caught.

ABC with the actual footage from the gun range at the end. Notice all of the smartphones recording the event.

Another view of the gun range shootout (short version) :

Longer version (in case some of you want to cry foul for the short version being from AJ:

 

[FdxUsmc]

Project Veritas has as much credibility as trump.

Isn’t Project Veritas the group that broke the “selling of baby parts” video.? Of course it is. Instead of dealing with the content of the video, you chose to attack the credibility of the whistleblower and Pro

What is ABC News' tagline? "Your Trusted Source"? OK.

Here you can see where ABC has been busted using footage from a semi annual machine gun shootout @ a Kentucky gun range as footage of the Kurds in Syria being "slaughtered". Lazy, lying, arrogant MSM wimps get caught.

ABC with the actual footage from the gun range at the end. Notice all of the smartphones recording the event.

Another view of the gun range shootout (short version) :

Longer version (in case some of you want to cry foul for the short version being from AJ:

Now that is funny

 

[Lake View Too]

Ahhhh, the whistleblowers...don't just love 'em? The real ones, that you know who they are; not the made up ones.

CNN, the once vaunted CNN. Remember when they first launched the first 24/7 news concept? They really were the pioneer. They were the go-to for up to the minute, accurate news, all pre-Twitter, pre-FB. And now they have just become an ardent partisan propaganda source with the Jabba the Hutt look a like President, Jeff Zucker.

Enjoy the latest whistleblower video from Project Veritas. Sorry for the Leftists on here, but you still have MSNBC, haha. Oh, and you lost ABC news this weekend too.

That was silly. Just plain silly. Do you really want to compare a bunch of drunk disgruntled low level cameramen who repeat themselves ad nauseum to a career CIA analyst who has first hand knowledge of serious crime being committed by the POTUS and steps forward and files a legitimate, and credible complaint through proper channels. If this is what call truth in news, you truly are about as silly as can be. Silly. I watched the whole thing because I truly want to understand the right wing nutjob mentality. The video repeated everything at least twice if not three times. It has two quotes directly from Zucker. One said he wanted everybody to concentrate on the impeachment. That sounds kind of logical since is the most important issue of the last fifteen years. Had it been 2002, I bet they would be told to concentrate on the Iraq War. (Just guessing). The second thing he said was the false reporting coming from Fox was ruining this country. He was quite correct on this. The rest of the video was OPINIONS from a bunch of guys drinking beer. If this is your idea of journalism, I've seen enough of the right wing nutjob mentality. Silly garbage.

 

[FdxUsmc]

That was silly. Just plain silly. Do you really want to compare a bunch of drunk disgruntled low level cameramen who repeat themselves ad nauseum to a career CIA analyst who has first hand knowledge of serious crime being committed by the POTUS and steps forward and files a legitimate, and credible complaint through proper channels. If this is what call truth in news, you truly are about as silly as can be. Silly.

We don’t know anything about the whistleblower being credible or not. We do know he DID NOT go through proper channels since he was in contact with Schiff prior to filing the complaint. And the whistleblower himself says it was second hand information.

 

[Lake View Too]

We don’t know anything about the whistleblower being credible or not. We do know he DID NOT go through proper channels since he was in contact with Schiff prior to filing the complaint. And the whistleblower himself says it was second hand information.

The inspector general said he followed proper procedure. The NSA director, under oath, said he did everything right. He did not personal meet with Schiff, but was in contact with his staff, which is standard operating procedure when a whistleblower doesn’t get traction talking to this immediate superior. The only thing you are correct about is that the first whistleblower did not have direct knowledge of the event. The second whistleblower did have direct knowledge of the event, and did go through proper channels. Now I want to hear your assessment of Drufter’s video. Please.

 

[FdxUsmc]

The inspector general said he followed proper procedure. The NSA director, under oath, said he did everything right. He did not personal meet with Schiff, but was in contact with his staff, which is standard operating procedure when a whistleblower doesn’t get traction talking to this immediate superior. The only thing you are correct about is that the first whistleblower did not have direct knowledge of the event. The second whistleblower did have direct knowledge of the event, and did go through proper channels. Now I want to hear your assessment of Drufter’s video. Please.

Please provide link on SOP going directly to congress if not getting traction from immediate superior.

There are two ways the whistleblower could report the alleged misconduct to Congress.

First, they can prepare a report and submit it to the Intelligence Community Inspector General, essentially an ombudsman for these kinds of problems. The inspector general will then determine if the complaint is credible and of “urgent concern.” Assuming the report is both of these things, they will send the whistleblower report to the Director of National Intelligence, who is supposed to send the report, along with any comments or concerns, to the appropriate congressional committee.

Secondly, the whistleblower can submit the report directly to Congress, but only if the inspector general decides the issue is not of urgent concern or is not credible. Additionally, the whistleblower must comply with appropriate security protocols to accommodate the existence of sensitive or classified information in the complaint.

 

[Leader of the Banned]

I knew I would lose Leader of the Lakeview Poppas with the occassional Jenksy, but there are plenty of reader/lurkers on here. Its for them.

It's all CNN employees detailing how obsessed Zucker is with Trump. You would definitely like it.

On a deeper level, it's about a major news organization, a member of the "fourth branch" trying to take down a sitting President.

At this point I have zero respect for anyone who isn't biased against Trump.

 

[Lake View Too]

Please provide link on SOP going directly to congress if not getting traction from immediate superior.

There are two ways the whistleblower could report the alleged misconduct to Congress.

First, they can prepare a report and submit it to the Intelligence Community Inspector General, essentially an ombudsman for these kinds of problems. The inspector general will then determine if the complaint is credible and of “urgent concern.” Assuming the report is both of these things, they will send the whistleblower report to the Director of National Intelligence, who is supposed to send the report, along with any comments or concerns, to the appropriate congressional committee.

Secondly, the whistleblower can submit the report directly to Congress, but only if the inspector general decides the issue is not of urgent concern or is not credible. Additionally, the whistleblower must comply with appropriate security protocols to accommodate the existence of sensitive or classified information in the complaint.

The ICIC did determine it to be credible and did determine it to be of urgent concern. The DNI concurred under oath. They were suppose to forward it to DNI I believe within 5 days, but were told not to. I believe it took 14 days to get there. They had no credible explanation for that.

I really don't know when in the timeline the first whistleblower talked to House Intelligence Committee staffer, but it is SOP. I listen to credible sources such as ABC, NBC, NPR, and NYT so I can't really say where I got that.

I know relatively nothing about the second whistleblower other than he has direct first hand knowledge of the event. There are approximately 10 people who listened to the phone call, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Do you really think all of them will risk obstruction of justice and lying to Congress to protect the liar in chief?Do you think Guiliani is going to take the rap?

Oh, and please give me your appraisal of Drifter's video. Let's compare sources.