PoppaJ
SoWal Insider
Wrong, here is Fox legal analyst Andrew Napolitano explaining it to the couch potatos.The one that says a formal vote in the house has to be done before a impeachment inquiry can take place. So what the Dems are trying to do behind closed doors is not legitimate. That’s the reason a group of Congress stormed the room. Enough is enough. This nonsense has gone on long enough. The Dems should put up or move on.
I ask you, What is trump trying to hide by attempting to block every witness called before the committee? No one would would ever block a witness who could exonerate them.Let me tell you what I did, Kilmeade, I read the House rules. And as frustrating as it may be to have these hearings going on behind closed doors, the hearings for which Congressman Schiff is presiding, they are consistent with the rules.
They can’t change the rules. They follow the rules. When were the rules written last? In January of 2015. And who signed them? John Boehner. And who enacted them, a Republican majority.”
The rules say this level of inquiry, this initial level of inquiry can be done in secret. What happened in the Nixon impeachment? My former boss. I was his page in the House of Representatives. Peter Rodino, instead of holding the hearings in secret, interviewed the witnesses in secret. Congressman Henry Hyde in the Clinton impeachment, witnesses interviewed in secret and presented in public. Congressman Schiff, with a different set of rules, chooses to do initial set of interviews in secret.”
Secret doesn’t work in this world. “ventually there will be a public presentation of this. At which point lawyers for the president can cross-examine these people and challenge them. This is like presenting a case to a grand jury, which is never done in public. So, I get it. The Republicans are frustrated. And they wanted to make a point. And they made their point. But this is just not the most effective way to show respect for what your colleagues are doing.”
Last edited: