• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Welcome to America

New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
The one that says a formal vote in the house has to be done before a impeachment inquiry can take place. So what the Dems are trying to do behind closed doors is not legitimate. That’s the reason a group of Congress stormed the room. Enough is enough. This nonsense has gone on long enough. The Dems should put up or move on.
Wrong, here is Fox legal analyst Andrew Napolitano explaining it to the couch potatos.
Let me tell you what I did, Kilmeade, I read the House rules. And as frustrating as it may be to have these hearings going on behind closed doors, the hearings for which Congressman Schiff is presiding, they are consistent with the rules.
They can’t change the rules. They follow the rules. When were the rules written last? In January of 2015. And who signed them? John Boehner. And who enacted them, a Republican majority.”
The rules say this level of inquiry, this initial level of inquiry can be done in secret. What happened in the Nixon impeachment? My former boss. I was his page in the House of Representatives. Peter Rodino, instead of holding the hearings in secret, interviewed the witnesses in secret. Congressman Henry Hyde in the Clinton impeachment, witnesses interviewed in secret and presented in public. Congressman Schiff, with a different set of rules, chooses to do initial set of interviews in secret.”

Secret doesn’t work in this world. “ventually there will be a public presentation of this. At which point lawyers for the president can cross-examine these people and challenge them. This is like presenting a case to a grand jury, which is never done in public. So, I get it. The Republicans are frustrated. And they wanted to make a point. And they made their point. But this is just not the most effective way to show respect for what your colleagues are doing.”
I ask you, What is trump trying to hide by attempting to block every witness called before the committee? No one would would ever block a witness who could exonerate them.
 
Last edited:
Wrong, here is Fox legal analyst Andrew Napolitano explaining it to the couch potatos.

I ask you, What is trump trying to hide by attempting to block every witness called before the committee? No one would would ever block a witness who could exonerate them.
He has said until a formal impeachment vote is taken he’s not going along with it. It’s simple and common sense, something that a lot of people are missing these days.
 
He has said until a formal impeachment vote is taken he’s not going along with it. It’s simple and common sense, something that a lot of people are missing these days.
There will be a formal trial in the Senate, when articles of impeachment is passed by the House. At that time Trump can take the witness stand under oath and tell his side of the story. At that time all the witnesses can be cross examined. Right now in these closed hearings, there are Republicans who have been given equal time to question those witnesses. Those Republicans can leak all the info they want, but most all the info is bad news.
 
There will be a formal trial in the Senate, when articles of impeachment is passed by the House. At that time Trump can take the witness stand under oath and tell his side of the story. At that time all the witnesses can be cross examined. Right now in these closed hearings, there are Republicans who have been given equal time to question those witnesses. Those Republicans can leak all the info they want, but most all the info is bad news.
Thanks for info. I’ll be waiting to see what happens. Just like the muller report. I guess it’s a wait and see again. Our tax dollars at their best.
 
Funny how you think nothing of what Dems are doing behind closed doors. It’s not right and against our laws. So yes some people in Congress have had enough of this do nothing Congress. Both Dems and republicans need to start doing what they are elected for.
It's no coincidence that the mob of Republican thugs pulled off their childish stunt only after the testimony against Trump was absolutely damning. You can bet Trump ordered it.
 
It's no coincidence that the mob of Republican thugs pulled off their childish stunt only after the testimony against Trump was absolutely damning. You can bet Trump ordered it.
Every defense angle of the lying prick president* has been shot down so all they have left is to whine and attack the process.
 
Every defense angle of the lying prick president* has been shot down so all they have left is to whine and attack the process.
I think it would be fitting for the cult leader to get impeached on November 18th. That would be the anniversary of the Jonestown massacre and mass suicide.
 
This is from Judge Napolitano of Fox News. The Democrats are totally acting within the rules enacted by a Republican house majority in 2015. Link is below:

“I read the House rules,” Napolitano said. “And as frustrating as it may be to have these hearings going on behind closed doors — the hearings over which Congressman Schiff is presiding — they are consistent with the rules.”

When co-host Brian Kilmeade interjected, claiming that Democrats “can make up any rules they want,” Napolitano said that wasn’t the case.


“Well, they can’t change the rules; they follow the rules,” Napolitano said, noting that the rules were last written in January 2015, signed by then-House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and enacted by the Republican House majority.

“The rules say that this level of inquiry, this initial level of inquiry, can be done in secret. … Secret evidence doesn’t work in this world, so eventually there will be a public presentation of this, at which lawyers for the president can cross-examine these people and challenge them,” Napolitano said. “This is like presenting a case to a grand jury, which is never done in public.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...MCX32YtZh2mCiRILG-wIUIxDxWoJZAhLi6NHVVAeVTDko
 
Last edited:
You are going to have to explain this statement. Healthcare? Infrastructure? Border resolution? Absolutely no progress on any of those fronts. NONE.

Please explain these amazing accomplishments. While you are at it explain how he has drained the swamp. I still see the same alligators there and several new ones.

As I said before, it is the same as the "closer" in baseball coming in the 9th and closing out the game then claiming that he won the game. No dumbass, you just didnt lose it.

A tax cut. Restructuring NAFTA and China...and the jury is still out there just ask most American farmers.

You are starting to see a lot of red tears too. Blind party loyalty is a fool's game. You are going to see more dissention in the ranks. People who have some self respect, respect for the office and an appreciation for our constitution..oh yeah and are smart enough to say "you know maybe a guy who has made over 13,000 false or misleading claims or flat out lies, is someone that I shouldn't support." Seriously, what can you believe from a guy who lies more times everyday than you wash your hands.

Time for Teflon Don to go. It is so comical and given his Dem past, wouldn't be awesome if he turns out to be a Dem plant! No better promoter for the Dems than Cheeto Jesus.

Great. We agree. My statement on healthcare, infrastructure, and border resolution have been put on the back burner while Congress chooses to partcipate in this clown show of an "impeachment inquiry". There are critical issues that need to be addressed and the Dems in the House have a singular focus of "getting Trump". The collective fiddling while Rome burns.
 
The President is acting like a school shooter.

How is the President acting like a school shooter? Or were you just employing a standard leftist tactic: it's OK to use a tragedy if you are using to try and advance a leftist opinion. Kind of like you wanted to name the impeachment inquiry The Elijah Cummings Memorial Impeachment Inquiry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top