• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Welcome to America

New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
upload_2019-10-30_19-3-52.jpeg





upload_2019-10-30_19-2-30.jpeg
 
Surprised? CIA. Registered Democrat. Susan Rice protege. Obama holdover. Brennan. Nuland. Biden.

https://www.realclearinvestigations...biden_brennan_dnc_oppo_researcher_120996.html

eric-ciaramella-image.jpg
You really don't get it, do you? The whistleblower is irrelevant. Everything the whistleblower alleged has been corroborated by multiple other sources, who, under oath, have given first hand testimony that the president did attempt to extort the president of Ukraine to affect the 2020 presidential election. Furthermore, it is the government's duty to protect the identity and the safety of the whistleblower. This aspect of the whistleblower's law has been in effect since the 1700's. Man, you love to ride your conspiracy theories like a baby child on a drunk donkey. Have fun.
 
You really don't get it, do you? The whistleblower is irrelevant. Everything the whistleblower alleged has been corroborated by multiple other sources, who, under oath, have given first hand testimony that the president did attempt to extort the president of Ukraine to affect the 2020 presidential election. Furthermore, it is the government's duty to protect the identity and the safety of the whistleblower. This aspect of the whistleblower's law has been in effect since the 1700's. Man, you love to ride your conspiracy theories like a baby child on a drunk donkey. Have fun.

Not sure he understands the concept of corroboration. There was corroboration right from the start with a summary of a phone call that practically amounts to a confession. "I would like you to do us a favor though" says the prez.
 
You really don't get it, do you? The whistleblower is irrelevant. Everything the whistleblower alleged has been corroborated by multiple other sources, who, under oath, have given first hand testimony that the president did attempt to extort the president of Ukraine to affect the 2020 presidential election. Furthermore, it is the government's duty to protect the identity and the safety of the whistleblower. This aspect of the whistleblower's law has been in effect since the 1700's. Man, you love to ride your conspiracy theories like a baby child on a drunk donkey. Have fun.
We have no idea what has been and what has not been corroborated. All we have are selected leaks/releases from the majority party. Does anyone think the majority party is going to leak/release material that damages their cause? We have no idea if Trump is concerned about the 2020 or 2016 election during the call. What’s more likely:
1. Trump is laser focused on 2020 election
2. Trump is pissed off about the Mueller Investigation and the surveillance of his 2016 campaign.
3. Both.
We simply don’t know and probably won’t know until it’s taken to the Senate.
 
We have no idea what has been and what has not been corroborated. All we have are selected leaks/releases from the majority party. Does anyone think the majority party is going to leak/release material that damages their cause? We have no idea if Trump is concerned about the 2020 or 2016 election during the call. What’s more likely:
1. Trump is laser focused on 2020 election
2. Trump is pissed off about the Mueller Investigation and the surveillance of his 2016 campaign.
3. Both.
We simply don’t know and probably won’t know until it’s taken to the Senate.
First of all, most all the info we have is not from leaks but from prepared statements by the witnesses. These have not been kept secret. Second, if there was exculpatory testimony pertaining to the president*, don't you think some of the Republican members of these hearings would leak it? The Republicans have had equal time to question the witnesses, but a lot of them have not even bothered to attend, even though they were members of these committees.
 
We have no idea what has been and what has not been corroborated. All we have are selected leaks/releases from the majority party. Does anyone think the majority party is going to leak/release material that damages their cause? We have no idea if Trump is concerned about the 2020 or 2016 election during the call. What’s more likely:
1. Trump is laser focused on 2020 election
2. Trump is pissed off about the Mueller Investigation and the surveillance of his 2016 campaign.
3. Both.
We simply don’t know and probably won’t know until it’s taken to the Senate.
Really? The people coming forward for depositions have claimed he wanted a made up investigation to be publicly read by the Ukrainian President and even wrote the script to be used. They also confirmed extortion was used, do is a favor in return for some cash. As far as leaks it could just as easily be lying fukface’s people. He had so many leaks he at one time was going to implement polygraphs in an attempt to plug the sieve. If this is the person every American should be outraged. Outing the whistleblower is equivalent to the outing of Valerie Plame, This is what Republicans do when they can’t defend their president’s actions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top