Welcome to America

[Leader of the Banned]

So is now the time the left is supposed to begin attacking his character and patriotism?

Or his political bias. I couldn't care less about stuff like that. I'm way more concerned with the facts of the matter. As far as I'm concerned, Morrison's statement is just further corroboration of evidence of wrongdoing first put forth by the whistleblower. In fact, I would go so far as to call him a whistleblower whether Trump and disciples realize it or not.

 

[Leader of the Banned]

Hell, I would even call Trump a whistleblower on on himself. Last time I saw so many whistleblowers, I was at a football game.

 

[PoppaJ]

Hell, Last time I saw so many whistleblowers, I was at a football game.

Family value Republicans in a gay bar.

 

[PoppaJ]

Hey Florida republicans, a tax evading serial sexual assaulter immigrant is seeking permanent residency in your state.

 

[PoppaJ]

Another reason to dislike this bigot.

 

[PoppaJ]

Tim Morrison, a senior National Security Council official, is set to step down amid an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, it has been confirmed.
After 19 years of government service, I have decided to leave the NSC,” he said in his opening statement to impeachment committees obtained by CBS News. “I have not submitted a formal resignation at this time because I do not want anyone to think there is a connection between my testimony today and my impending departure. I plan to finalize my transition from the NSC after my testimony is complete.”
Morrison was among those who listened in on Trump’s July 25 phone call with the leader of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky. The call is the focus of a Democrat-led impeachment inquiry into Trump.

In Morrison’s testimony on Thursday, he told House lawmakers conducting the impeachment inquiry that he thought there was nothing illegal in Trump’s request for Zelensky to investigate the Bidens’ involvement in the 2016 firing of a top Ukrainian prosecutor, Victor Shokin.

“I want to be clear. I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed,” he said.

More mud in the waters since we only have partial information.

13 people have testified that trump solicited Ukraine to interfere in the US elections
I believe them.

Tim Morrison ... told House investigators over eight hours of closed-door testimony that the "substance" of his conversations recalled by William B. Taylor Jr., the acting ambassador to Ukraine, was "accurate," according to his prepared remarks and people familiar with Morrison's testimony.

In particular, Morrison verified that Trump's envoy to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, conveyed to a Ukrainian official that the military aid would be released if the country investigated an energy firm linked to the son of former vice president Joe Biden.

 

[FdxUsmc]

Another reason to dislike this bigot.

And in the real world this happened:

HHS Issues Proposed Rule to Align Grants Regulation with New Legislation, Nondiscrimination Laws, and Supreme Court Decisions

 

[PoppaJ]

And in the real world this happened:

HHS Issues Proposed Rule to Align Grants Regulation with New Legislation, Nondiscrimination Laws, and Supreme Court Decisions

Correct, so what are you once again not comprehending?

 

[FdxUsmc]

Correct, so what are you once again not comprehending?

The proposed rule represents the Trump Administration's strong commitment to the rule of law―the Constitution, federal statutes, and Supreme Court decisions. These require that the federal government not infringe on religious freedom in its operation of HHS grant programs and address the impact of regulatory actions on small entities.

What do you disagree with:
The Rule of law
The Constitution
Federal statues
Supreme Court Decisions
Religious freedom (my money is here?)

 

[PoppaJ]

The proposed rule represents the Trump Administration's strong commitment to the rule of law―the Constitution, federal statutes, and Supreme Court decisions. These require that the federal government not infringe on religious freedom in its operation of HHS grant programs and address the impact of regulatory actions on small entities.

What do you disagree with:
The Rule of law
The constitution
Federal statues
Supreme Court Decisions
Religious freedom (my money is here?)

I disagree with using your religious beliefs to discriminate against a segment of society who simply practice a different form of sex. Something that has no affect on you and is none of yours or my fkn business. And this change is exactly that. Amusing how your party is deathly afraid of Sharia Law yet seeks to enact penalties on individuals in the same manner. As long as trump is turning back the clock would you also support a return to the time in our history when religion was used to discriminate against race? I will never understand why a country whose Constitution prohibits establishment of a national religion keeps pandering to one. If so called “christians” don’t like gay sex then they shouldn’t engage in gay sex. A minority group gaining equal rights does not mean Christians are losing rights.