• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Welcome to America

New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dearest Leader of the Banned,

Here is your daily dose of conspiracy theories. Enjoy and have a wonderful day!


I like the fact that I don't have to work too hard or resort to hyperbole and special effects. All I have to do is provide a link to Trump's Twitter feed.
 
You obviously have not listened to Amy Robach's own words. "it was ready to go". "I tried for three years and was turned away the whole time". With that damning of a story, why wouldn't ABC cross reference, do a deep dive investigation to get the story "ready to air".

What's striking is the contortions you have to bend yourself into defending a broken, lying propaganda "news source", ABC. If they would have broken the story three years ago, tell me poppa how many teenage girls could have been spared the torture, rape, and permanent scaring. What's the number?
Here is her words again
The interview itself, while I was disappointed it didn’t air, didn’t meet our standards,” Robach said Tuesday. “In the years since no one has ever told me or the team to stop reporting on Jeffrey Epstein, and we have continued to aggressively pursue this important story.”
Now I don’t watch ABC or give two shts about them, but why do you believe network news is more responsible for law enforcement than say, law enforcement who gave him a sweetheart deal?
 
Here is her words again

You are posting what Amy said on Tuesday, the day after ABC was cold busted. Turns out, the vaunted New York Times sat on it too. Even the uber liberal NPR had a long episode questioning why the big MSM groups sat on it. Well, in the NYT case, all it took was a five-figure donation to the key reporters favorite charity.

Here's what Amy Robach said on tape/video:

"I've had this story for three years, I've had this interview with (Epstein Victim) Virginia Roberts. We would not put in on the air. First of all, I was asked who is Jeffrey Epstein? No one knows who this is. It's a stupid story."

"Then the Palace (British) found out we had her allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened us a million different ways. We (ABC) were so afraid we wouldn't be able to interview Kate and Will that we, that also quashed the story."

"And then Alan Dershowitz was also implicated in, cause of the planes she (Virginia Roberts) told me everything. She had pictures, she had everything. She was in hiding for 12 years. We convinced her to come out. We convinced her to talk to us. It was unbelievable what we had Clinton (Bill), we had everything."

Off camera producer: "But the creepy thing is we would make access to all these high profile people".

Robach: "Well I got a little concerne WHY I couldn't get it on".

There's more, but this is enough for now.


I tried for three years to get it on to no avail. And now it's coming out like its these new revelations."

"Like every day I more and more pissed cause I'm just like, what we had was unreal. Other women backing it up"

"Brad Edwards, (victim) Virginia Roberts attorney, three years ago saying, like, we, there will come a day when we realize that Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific pedophile this country has ever known. I had it all....three years ago."
 
White Power
upload_2019-11-6_22-9-32.jpeg
 
No, most white racists are republicans.- fixed it for you.
It works both ways, what haven’t Republicans elected a black to that position before and why are you so obsessed with a candidates race?
Democrats elect on qualification not race that is why there is such a diversity of race, ethnicity, and gender among the Dems. presently serving.


Gerrymandering:)
 
It no longer bothers me that Rand's neighbor beat the crap out of him.

Rand Paul says he 'probably will' disclose whistleblower's name

Rand Paul to reporter
You should work on the facts. The whistleblower statute protects the whistleblower from having his name revealed by the inspector general. Even The New York Times admits that no one else is under any legal obligation. The other point, and you need to be very careful if you really are interested in the news, is that the whistleblower actually is a material witness, completely separate from being the whistleblower because he worked for Joe Biden, at the same time [that] Hunter Biden was receiving $50,000 a month.
 
Rand Paul to reporter
You should work on the facts. The whistleblower statute protects the whistleblower from having his name revealed by the inspector general. Even The New York Times admits that no one else is under any legal obligation. The other point, and you need to be very careful if you really are interested in the news, is that the whistleblower actually is a material witness, completely separate from being the whistleblower because he worked for Joe Biden, at the same time [that] Hunter Biden was receiving $50,000 a month.
I’m not sure how Rand Paul got this information, but chances are the whistleblower worked for the United States Government rather than worked for Joe Biden. Big difference.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top