• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Welcome to America

New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
First off, Biden was working for approved US policy, not for his own personal political gain. Second, the prosecutor he was trying to get removed was considered corrupt by the EU, NATO, and the World Bank, among many other international entities. The prosecutor was corrupt because he was not investigating corruption. Facts matter.
Can’t violate IPC for US policy
 
Can’t violate IPC for US policy
You still don’t get it do you. Biden threatened to withhold payment as a negotiating tool, and successfully got a corrupt prosecutor removed. Trump withheld funds that were already approved by Congress and all involved government agencies. Facts matter.
 
You still don’t get it do you. Biden threatened to withhold payment as a negotiating tool, and successfully got a corrupt prosecutor removed. Trump withheld funds that were already approved by Congress and all involved government agencies. Facts matter.
Congress had approved the funds Biden withheld. This is not hard:banging:
 
Congress had approved the funds Biden withheld. This is not hard:banging:
Biden did NOT withhold the funds. He THREATENED to withhold the funds. Trump withheld the funds and the GAO officially said he violated the law. Stop making up bullsht.
 
Biden did NOT withhold the funds. He THREATENED to withhold the funds. Trump withheld the funds and the GAO officially said he violated the law. Stop making up bullsht.
Lakeview give it up. This is willful ignorance. These dumbasses don't want to understand the distinct differences. If Obama or Biden threw a horseshoe and trump threw a grenade these idiots would swear it was exactly the same thing.
 
2B091755-2BB1-4C75-A002-2324F5460F4B.jpeg
 
That was about the silliest thing you have ever posted. Obama gave a dinner for 6 Chinese representatives and there was no money appropriated for this. Wow, is that brazen, or what?!
On the other hand, our present IMPOTUS tried to extort the leader of a foreign country by withholding $400,000,000 in military aid, to try to affect the outcome of the upcoming presidential election, and he has been engage in a continuing cover-up since he was caught doing so. I wonder which one is an impeachable offense . Oh wait, I guess the House already answered that question.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top