Oh Poppaj,I guess I need to help you once again. First, FAKE NEWS! is not news believed to be accurate when reported. That is just something the red tie tyrant has convinced you of. Second, as usual you have not read the link. There is a correction, something reputable news organizations will do, but it’s not exactly what you believe it is. Try again.
why do you think I laughed at the link when you first posted it? It was obviously a fake news hit piece. Any reputable news organization would of made one phone call to Bank of China to confirm the story. This is exactly how MSM preys on the low information voter. Front page sensational headline followed by a page 7 correction 
You obviously still haven’t read it.Oh Poppaj,why do you think I laughed at the link when you first posted it? It was obviously a fake news hit piece. Any reputable news organization would of made one phone call to Bank of China to confirm the story. This is exactly how MSM preys on the low information voter. Front page sensational headline followed by a page 7 correction
![]()
Don’t forget Bank of China said this:You obviously still haven’t read it.
Ok, I’ll do it for you since you, like trump, refuse to read. They did ask. In fact they asked a number of people. Including Dr. Drano’s admin. They either could not or would not clarify the debt.
Another public document, however, lists Bank of China as a creditor on 1290 Avenue of the Americas even after the bank said it was no longer involved in the property. Filed in 2017 with the New York City Department of Finance Office of the Register, it lists the Bank of China as a secured party having a financial interest in the building’s fixtures.
The Bank of China could not explain why its name was listed on the 2017 document, describing it as “technical error.” Trepp, a database of securitized mortgages, also listed the Bank of China along with the three other banks, in a description on their site about the financing of the building. The site noted the Bank of China might securitize their portion of the loan, although there were no additional comments.
documentfiled in 2012 in New York City that showed the mortgage on the property had been assigned to a new financial institution as a trustee for the debt, listing Bank of China as an “assignor/old lender.” But it declined to share additional documentation on the loan.
Vornado Realty Trust, the primary investor in the building, did not reply to a request for comment, and the White House and Trump Organization declined to comment for this story.
You didn’t even read the entire Dailywire article which claims Politico quietly issued a correction, but at least did include this,Don’t forget Bank of China said this:
said Peter Reisman, managing director and chief communications officer of Bank of China U.S.A. ‘Within 22 days, the loan was securitized and sold into the [commercial mortgage-backed securities] market, as is a common practice in the industry. Bank of China has not had any ownership interest in that loan since late November 2012,
Article should never have been published.