• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Welcome to America

New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
upload_2020-4-26_8-27-42.jpeg
 
I guess I need to help you once again. First, FAKE NEWS! is not news believed to be accurate when reported. That is just something the red tie tyrant has convinced you of. Second, as usual you have not read the link. There is a correction, something reputable news organizations will do, but it’s not exactly what you believe it is. Try again.
Oh Poppaj, :spin:why do you think I laughed at the link when you first posted it? It was obviously a fake news hit piece. Any reputable news organization would of made one phone call to Bank of China to confirm the story. This is exactly how MSM preys on the low information voter. Front page sensational headline followed by a page 7 correction :yikes:
 
Oh Poppaj, :spin:why do you think I laughed at the link when you first posted it? It was obviously a fake news hit piece. Any reputable news organization would of made one phone call to Bank of China to confirm the story. This is exactly how MSM preys on the low information voter. Front page sensational headline followed by a page 7 correction :yikes:
You obviously still haven’t read it.

Ok, I’ll do it for you since you, like trump, refuse to read. They did ask. In fact they asked a number of people. Including Dr. Drano’s admin. They either could not or would not clarify the debt.




Another public document, however, lists Bank of China as a creditor on 1290 Avenue of the Americas even after the bank said it was no longer involved in the property. Filed in 2017 with the New York City Department of Finance Office of the Register, it lists the Bank of China as a secured party having a financial interest in the building’s fixtures.

The Bank of China could not explain why its name was listed on the 2017 document, describing it as “technical error.” Trepp, a database of securitized mortgages, also listed the Bank of China along with the three other banks, in a description on their site about the financing of the building. The site noted the Bank of China might securitize their portion of the loan, although there were no additional comments.

documentfiled in 2012 in New York City that showed the mortgage on the property had been assigned to a new financial institution as a trustee for the debt, listing Bank of China as an “assignor/old lender.” But it declined to share additional documentation on the loan.

Vornado Realty Trust, the primary investor in the building, did not reply to a request for comment, and the White House and Trump Organization declined to comment for this story.
 
Last edited:
You obviously still haven’t read it.

Ok, I’ll do it for you since you, like trump, refuse to read. They did ask. In fact they asked a number of people. Including Dr. Drano’s admin. They either could not or would not clarify the debt.




Another public document, however, lists Bank of China as a creditor on 1290 Avenue of the Americas even after the bank said it was no longer involved in the property. Filed in 2017 with the New York City Department of Finance Office of the Register, it lists the Bank of China as a secured party having a financial interest in the building’s fixtures.

The Bank of China could not explain why its name was listed on the 2017 document, describing it as “technical error.” Trepp, a database of securitized mortgages, also listed the Bank of China along with the three other banks, in a description on their site about the financing of the building. The site noted the Bank of China might securitize their portion of the loan, although there were no additional comments.

documentfiled in 2012 in New York City that showed the mortgage on the property had been assigned to a new financial institution as a trustee for the debt, listing Bank of China as an “assignor/old lender.” But it declined to share additional documentation on the loan.

Vornado Realty Trust, the primary investor in the building, did not reply to a request for comment, and the White House and Trump Organization declined to comment for this story.
Don’t forget Bank of China said this:

said Peter Reisman, managing director and chief communications officer of Bank of China U.S.A. ‘Within 22 days, the loan was securitized and sold into the [commercial mortgage-backed securities] market, as is a common practice in the industry. Bank of China has not had any ownership interest in that loan since late November 2012,
Article should never have been published.
 
Can you imagine not letting Americans return home during a global pandemic? WTF?
Buck Sexton (@BuckSexton) Tweeted:
Someone needs to tell Pelosi that the tens-of-thousands of people traveling from China that she now claims should have also been barred from entering the U.S. are called “Americans” CNN Politics on Twitter



Trish Regan (@trish_regan) Tweeted:
This quote speaks to how messed up #Pelosi & the #Dems message has become. Remember when they thought #Trump shutting down our border w/ #China was “xenophobic?” Well, NOW, she claims he didn’t shut them down enough. Wild. CNN Politics on Twitter



Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) Tweeted:
Let’s note: Pelosi promoted “No Ban Act” legislation that *same day* - which would limit presidential power to restrict travel.

Now saying she would’ve stopped US citizens from being repatriated? Because those were the travelers she’s saying we should have “shut the door” on. CNN Politics on Twitter

 
Don’t forget Bank of China said this:

said Peter Reisman, managing director and chief communications officer of Bank of China U.S.A. ‘Within 22 days, the loan was securitized and sold into the [commercial mortgage-backed securities] market, as is a common practice in the industry. Bank of China has not had any ownership interest in that loan since late November 2012,
Article should never have been published.
You didn’t even read the entire Dailywire article which claims Politico quietly issued a correction, but at least did include this,


“POLITICO reported that the Trump Organization is a party to a loan that includes the Bank of China,” a Politico spokesperson said. “This was based on multiple publicly available documents, including a 2017 filing with the city of New York that remains current through 2022. The loan and the Bank of China’s participation in the financing of the property at 1290 Avenue of the Americas is part of the public record.”

“After publication, the Bank of China’s NY-based PR representative called, stating that the Bank had sold that debt shortly after the 2012 deal. We included their on-the-record statement—that focused on this specific loan—in full. We also noted that the Bank of China described the 2017 public filing as a ‘technical error.’ It did not agree to provide documentation to support their assertion it has no ‘ownership interest’ in ‘that loan’ or any other loan. The updated article and headline reflected this new reporting, and the changes were prominently flagged atop the article.”

“Finance experts have told POLITICO that the documents provided to us were complex and didn’t necessarily reveal who currently holds that debt, including the Bank of China. The 2017 filing with the city of New York still lists them as a creditor.
POLITICO will continue to report on this story.”

“Still lists them as creditors” as in to this day in 2020 and will not provide documents to refute the official record. They asked and were not answered.
 
Last edited:
:doh: trump again proves to be a dumbass international embarrassment. He not only can’t spell Nobel he confuses it with the Pulitzer. Right wingers will now try to tell us how they are the same.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top