Pam Hicks, Pam Hicks, your caps lock key sticks.BOO HOO IM SO ASHAMED TO BE AMERCAN IM GOING TO MOVE TO FRANCE!!! GET OVER YOURSELF SNOWFLAKES TRUMP IS BADASS!!!!!!!
[/QUOTE]I guess that means you are not interested in the truth. SAD
BOO HOO IM SO ASHAMED TO BE AMERCAN IM GOING TO MOVE TO FRANCE!!! GET OVER YOURSELF SNOWFLAKES TRUMP IS BADASS!!!!!!!
Go to Catholics for Trump and watch it. He did not make fun of this person.
Are you talking about Giuliani's "Truth isn't truth" or Kellyanne's "Alternative facts?"I guess that means you are not interested in the truth. SAD
After Trump then became the center of a second, even bigger controversy for supposedly having callously mocked a disabled reporter in public (
that Trump was mocking Kovaleski was undeniable, but whether he was specifically mocking Kovaleski’s appearance and disability was a subject of debate), Trump asserted that the whole thing was just a coincidence — he had no idea who Kovaleski was and thus couldn’t have been aware of his physical condition
as Kovaleski had covered Trump extensively while working for the Daily News from 1987 to 1993 and had interviewed and talked to the business magnate numerous times during that period:
Trump said that Clinton is "wrong" to say he mocked a disabled reporter.
Trump may deny that he intentionally mocked Kovaleski for his disability, but many Americans believe his remarks amounted to mocking, and we concur that that’s a reasonable -- indeed, perhaps the only -- interpretation of his actions. The notion that Trump’s comments about Cruz and a general undercut Clinton’s claim don’t hold water, because all three examples constitute mocking, whether a disability was involved or not. We rate the statement False.
The Pinocchio Test
It remains a mystery why Trump feels to need to revisit past controversies, particularly ones that reflect poorly on his tenor and judgment. But, as the evidence shows, Trump clearly mocked Kovaleski – who in any case never “groveled” or in any way took back his reporting.
In an unremarkable statement, Kovaleski merely said that his reporting did not back up Trump’s statement that “thousands” of Muslims celebrated the fall of the Twin Towers – and then Trump attacked him.
Four Pinocchios
Your funny, I have lost nothing. Do you homework and like I said go to Catholics 4 Trump.com. (I guess I had to spell it out for you) . You will see that he did not mock the reporter. I’m sure there has been priest who did bad things. Just like lots of other men and women. As for as the Catholic boys, please don’t fall for the same old crap from the media. Watch the whole video, this would not have been a issue if they were not at the March for life and wearing a hat. Get over yourself thinking you know everything. Stop walking around with left wing blinders on. Media is making this country a joke and people like you are just going along with it. So Sad!@Dennyk Catholics for Trump? You just lost ANY and ALL credibility you might have or were ever going to have! I bet you also believe ALL those priests didn't have sex with lil boys too, don't ya?
Wasn't it "good lil Catholic boys" in a stare down recently with a native american screaming "Build that wall"?