• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Welcome to America

New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Since our treasonous prez is busy shaking down foreign intelligence services I guess that frees up ours to look into the three traitor tots activities because there is no question those twits and daddy are cashing in. Kushner got a billion plus dollar bailout from Qatar for a bad real estate deal and princess received trademark deals from China and who knows what else is there.
 
Last edited:
What is portrayed as an “impeachment inquiry” is actually just a made-for-cable-TV political soap opera. The House of Representatives is not conducting a formal impeachment inquiry. To the contrary, congressional Democrats are conducting the 2020 political campaign.

The House has not voted as a body to authorize an impeachment inquiry. What we have are partisan theatrics, proceeding under the ipse dixit of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). It raises the profile, but not the legitimacy, of the same “impeachment inquiry” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) previously tried to abracadabra into being without a committee vote.

Moreover, there are no subpoenas. As Secretary Pompeo observed in his fittingly tart response on Tuesday, what the committee chairmen issued was merely a letter. Its huffing and puffing notwithstanding, the letter is nothing more than an informal request for voluntary cooperation. Legally, it has no compulsive power. If anything, it is rife with legal deficiencies.

The Democrats, of course, hope you don’t notice that the House is not conducting a formal impeachment inquiry. They are using the guise of frenetic activity by several standing committees — Intelligence, Judiciary, Foreign Affairs, Oversight and Reform, Financial Services, and Ways and Means — whose normal oversight functions are being gussied up to look like serious impeachment business.

But standing committees do have subpoena power, so why not use it? Well, because subpoenas get litigated in court when the people or agencies on the receiving end object. Democrats want to have an impeachment show — um, inquiry — on television; they do not want to defend its bona fides in court.
 
What is portrayed as an “impeachment inquiry” is actually just a made-for-cable-TV political soap opera. The House of Representatives is not conducting a formal impeachment inquiry. To the contrary, congressional Democrats are conducting the 2020 political campaign.

The House has not voted as a body to authorize an impeachment inquiry. What we have are partisan theatrics, proceeding under the ipse dixit of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). It raises the profile, but not the legitimacy, of the same “impeachment inquiry” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) previously tried to abracadabra into being without a committee vote.

Moreover, there are no subpoenas. As Secretary Pompeo observed in his fittingly tart response on Tuesday, what the committee chairmen issued was merely a letter. Its huffing and puffing notwithstanding, the letter is nothing more than an informal request for voluntary cooperation. Legally, it has no compulsive power. If anything, it is rife with legal deficiencies.

The Democrats, of course, hope you don’t notice that the House is not conducting a formal impeachment inquiry. They are using the guise of frenetic activity by several standing committees — Intelligence, Judiciary, Foreign Affairs, Oversight and Reform, Financial Services, and Ways and Means — whose normal oversight functions are being gussied up to look like serious impeachment business.

But standing committees do have subpoena power, so why not use it? Well, because subpoenas get litigated in court when the people or agencies on the receiving end object. Democrats want to have an impeachment show — um, inquiry — on television; they do not want to defend its bona fides in court.
The show must go on.
 
The show must go on.
That makes no sense that you would say the show must go on. Yes waste more money and get nothing done for the America people. So sad that anyone would actually want that. What about the jobs report and unemployment statements today. Lowest unemployment since 1969. That show must go on.
 
What about the eight Benghazi commissions that lasted four years and found Hillary Clinton free of blame for what happen there? She testified under oath to Congress for 11 hours. If Trump wants to testify under oath to Congress, I'm sure we can get this resolved in one hour. I could mention the Clinton Whitewater investigation that also went four years and found nothing, but I won't. This show is just starting. Have some popcorn.
 
As for getting a thing done, the House has passed in excess of 30 bills that the Senate has refused to even vote on.
 
That makes no sense that you would say the show must go on. Yes waste more money and get nothing done for the America people. So sad that anyone would actually want that. What about the jobs report and unemployment statements today. Lowest unemployment since 1969. That show must go on.
I'm sorry, I meant to say the show WILL go on. Yeah, impeachment is imminent. Got the popcorn ready.
 
What about the eight Benghazi commissions that lasted four years and found Hillary Clinton free of blame for what happen there? She testified under oath to Congress for 11 hours. If Trump wants to testify under oath to Congress, I'm sure we can get this resolved in one hour. I could mention the Clinton Whitewater investigation that also went four years and found nothing, but I won't. This show is just starting. Have some popcorn.
Exactly, people are so impatient.
 
What about the eight Benghazi commissions that lasted four years and found Hillary Clinton free of blame for what happen there? She testified under oath to Congress for 11 hours. If Trump wants to testify under oath to Congress, I'm sure we can get this resolved in one hour. I could mention the Clinton Whitewater investigation that also went four years and found nothing, but I won't. This show is just starting. Have some popcorn.
Dennyk is still fuming that Hillary isn't behind bars.
 
What is portrayed as an “impeachment inquiry” is actually just a made-for-cable-TV political soap opera. The House of Representatives is not conducting a formal impeachment inquiry. To the contrary, congressional Democrats are conducting the 2020 political campaign.

The House has not voted as a body to authorize an impeachment inquiry. What we have are partisan theatrics, proceeding under the ipse dixit of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). It raises the profile, but not the legitimacy, of the same “impeachment inquiry” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) previously tried to abracadabra into being without a committee vote.

Moreover, there are no subpoenas. As Secretary Pompeo observed in his fittingly tart response on Tuesday, what the committee chairmen issued was merely a letter. Its huffing and puffing notwithstanding, the letter is nothing more than an informal request for voluntary cooperation. Legally, it has no compulsive power. If anything, it is rife with legal deficiencies.

The Democrats, of course, hope you don’t notice that the House is not conducting a formal impeachment inquiry. They are using the guise of frenetic activity by several standing committees — Intelligence, Judiciary, Foreign Affairs, Oversight and Reform, Financial Services, and Ways and Means — whose normal oversight functions are being gussied up to look like serious impeachment business.

But standing committees do have subpoena power, so why not use it? Well, because subpoenas get litigated in court when the people or agencies on the receiving end object. Democrats want to have an impeachment show — um, inquiry — on television; they do not want to defend its bona fides in court.
Post a link or copy and paste that vote requirement that has your panties in such a wad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top