Welcome to America

[Leader of the Banned]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/senate/480301-graham-there-will-be-51-gop-votes-to-call-bidens-whistleblower?amp
He acts as if this is a threat. Go ahead and call him what are they afraid of?

I would be willing to bet that the whistleblower would have no problem coming forward to corroborate the indelible truth at this point.

 

[carson]

Opinion | Trump did get Mexico to build a wall — of its troops on its own southern border

Ahhhhhh. Dahhh.

 

[Bob Wells]

I would be willing to bet that the whistleblower would have no problem coming forward to corroborate the indelible truth at this point.

Senator Graham should be wary of what he wishes for. Please call witnesses! Call everyone he has named and a few more. Yes the President will invoked Executive Privilege and yes the Democrats will howl. But the process will drag on as the courts will get involved.

 

[FdxUsmc]

Senator Graham should be wary of what he wishes for. Please call witnesses! Call everyone he has named and a few more. Yes the President will invoked Executive Privilege and yes the Democrats will howl. But the process will drag on as the courts will get involved.

Why should the senate go the court route when the house refused too?

It seems to me that no good case has been made for witnesses,” Schumer said during a press conference on Jan. 27, 1999.

Days later, he argued that there was no reason to call witnesses, saying: “I wonder if the House managers aren’t a little more interested in political theater than in actually getting to the bottom of the facts.”
Schumer Demands Witnesses At Senate Trial. Here’s What He Said During Clinton’s Impeachment.

 

[Lake View Too]

Why should the senate go the court route when the house refused too?

It seems to me that no good case has been made for witnesses,” Schumer said during a press conference on Jan. 27, 1999.

Days later, he argued that there was no reason to call witnesses, saying: “I wonder if the House managers aren’t a little more interested in political theater than in actually getting to the bottom of the facts.”
Schumer Demands Witnesses At Senate Trial. Here’s What He Said During Clinton’s Impeachment.

It was mentioned in the proceeding today that the court fight pertaining to the Don McGagn subpoena has lasted nine months so far with no decision in sight. Do you think the House would have been making the right decision if the impeachment stretched into the election. Then what?

 

[FdxUsmc]

It was mentioned in the proceeding today that the court fight pertaining to the Don McGagn subpoena has lasted nine months so far with no decision in sight. Do you think the House would have been making the right decision if the impeachment stretched into the election. Then what?

The senate court fight will take longer, since it started what five months after the house started.

 

[Lake View Too]

The senate court fight will take longer, since it started what five months after the house started.

If Trump lets witnesses testify, it might be over in a week.

 

[FdxUsmc]

If Trump lets witnesses testify, it might be over in a week.

If the house had a case it would of been over in a week

 

[Bob Wells]

Why should the senate go the court route when the house refused too?

It seems to me that no good case has been made for witnesses,” Schumer said during a press conference on Jan. 27, 1999.

Days later, he argued that there was no reason to call witnesses, saying: “I wonder if the House managers aren’t a little more interested in political theater than in actually getting to the bottom of the facts.”
Schumer Demands Witnesses At Senate Trial. Here’s What He Said During Clinton’s Impeachment.

Guess you miss the point. It would be the President that will drag this out if the Senate calls for witnesses

 

[PoppaJ]

If the house had a case it would of been over in a week

If you republicans weren’t so gullible and trump wasn’t such a self serving piece of sht the country would never be in this mess.