• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Welcome to America

New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Congratulations Daniel Cameron!

BREAKING: First African-American Wins Kentucky AG Race. He’s A Republican.

Attorney Daniel Cameron became the first Republican elected to be Kentucky Attorney General in more than 70 years on Tuesday night and became the first African-American to ever be elected to the position.

Cameron, 33, also became “the first African-American voted individually to state-wide office in Kentucky history,”

Because white Republicans are all racists right? How is that the Democrats never got a black person elected to that position?

Daniel-Cameron.jpg
 
Your religion is your business not mine. I am only anti-religion when Bible thumping a-holes want to force their religious beliefs on everyone, but you are avoiding the facts. Are trump and his minions attacking the credibility of everyone who testifies under oath he was trying to extort Ukraine, yes or no?

I was just setting the record straight. I respect whatever you or anyone believe or don't believe.

Would you believe that I beat up (figuratively) on my "Trump forever" church going folks? Its a peeve of mine that some of them have gone all in on Trump the man but to each his own.

Your yes or no: I have no idea. But at least two of the "witnesses" have had to admit that they did not directly witness what they said at first. Look, we all know what's going on, and what's going to happen. We knew the day the D's won the House. I would just as soon have the vote tomorrow, and get on with life. But that won't happen when all these Reps and Senators can have TV time. We have an election coming in less than a year and they want soundbites!!
 
I was just setting the record straight. I respect whatever you or anyone believe or don't believe.

Would you believe that I beat up (figuratively) on my "Trump forever" church going folks? Its a peeve of mine that some of them have gone all in on Trump the man but to each his own.

Your yes or no: I have no idea. But at least two of the "witnesses" have had to admit that they did not directly witness what they said at first. Look, we all know what's going on, and what's going to happen. We knew the day the D's won the House. I would just as soon have the vote tomorrow, and get on with life. But that won't happen when all these Reps and Senators can have TV time. We have an election coming in less than a year and they want soundbites!!
You have no idea if trump et al. are attacking the witnesses coming froward? Change news sources.
 
Many folks are convicted of crimes on circumstantial evidence. The Presidents ever changing tale, and it is everyone else's fault mentality, fake news banner and everyone who is coming forward is a Never Trumper is both sad and funny. I am awed that so many defend their vote for the President. Of course, I am truly a never Trumper but I do believe in the rules and believe in accountability. I believe the Impeachment process should go forward. I hope the House has better prosecutors than Marsha Clark and Christopher Darden.
 
Congratulations Daniel Cameron!

BREAKING: First African-American Wins Kentucky AG Race. He’s A Republican.

Attorney Daniel Cameron became the first Republican elected to be Kentucky Attorney General in more than 70 years on Tuesday night and became the first African-American to ever be elected to the position.

Cameron, 33, also became “the first African-American voted individually to state-wide office in Kentucky history,”

Because white Republicans are all racists right? How is that the Democrats never got a black person elected to that position?

Daniel-Cameron.jpg
No, most white racists are republicans.- fixed it for you.
It works both ways, what haven’t Republicans elected a black to that position before and why are you so obsessed with a candidates race?
Democrats elect on qualification not race that is why there is such a diversity of race, ethnicity, and gender among the Dems. presently serving.
 
Last edited:
Many folks are convicted of crimes on circumstantial evidence. The Presidents ever changing tale, and it is everyone else's fault mentality, fake news banner and everyone who is coming forward is a Never Trumper is both sad and funny. I am awed that so many defend their vote for the President. Of course, I am truly a never Trumper but I do believe in the rules and believe in accountability. I believe the Impeachment process should go forward. I hope the House has better prosecutors than Marsha Clark and Christopher Darden.
IMHO Clark and Darden proved their case, but they had the equivalent of today’s Republican senate as a jury.
 
ABC says interview with Epstein accuser wasn't ready to air
Robach said in her statement Tuesday that she had been referring in the video to what Giuffre had said in the interview, not what ABC News had verified through its own reporting. Corroborating evidence of the type the network sought could include interviews with people familiar with Giuffre’s allegations or records that would verify she was at the places the alleged sex acts took place.

“The interview itself, while I was disappointed it didn’t air, didn’t meet our standards,” Robach said Tuesday. “In the years since no one has ever told me or the team to stop reporting on Jeffrey Epstein, and we have continued to aggressively pursue this important story.”
 
Many folks are convicted of crimes on circumstantial evidence. The Presidents ever changing tale, and it is everyone else's fault mentality, fake news banner and everyone who is coming forward is a Never Trumper is both sad and funny. I am awed that so many defend their vote for the President. Of course, I am truly a never Trumper but I do believe in the rules and believe in accountability. I believe the Impeachment process should go forward. I hope the House has better prosecutors than Marsha Clark and Christopher Darden.
Right, and I don't think the burden of proof is the same as in a criminal trial. I believe a greater amount of subjectivity is to be expected in an impeachment process than in a criminal trial. President is essentially being fired, and the Senate has the final word on the matter. How can anyone not take into account the President's bombastic abusive ramblings that have been occuring during the process? It would be a moral failing for the house not to impeach him. I feel the same about his removal by the Senate, but my expectations are very low.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top