• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Welcome to America

New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Lake View Too said:
That was about the silliest thing you have ever posted. Obama gave a dinner for 6 Chinese representatives and there was no money appropriated for this. Wow, is that brazen, or what?!
On the other hand, our present IMPOTUS tried to extort the leader of a foreign country by withholding $400,000,000 in military aid, to try to affect the outcome of the upcoming presidential election, and he has been engage in a continuing cover-up since he was caught doing so. I wonder which one is an impeachable offense . Oh wait, I guess the House already answered that question.
Click to expand...
What about these times? More excuses? My favorite is Bergdahl.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/01/16/seven-times-the-gao-found-the-obama-administration-violated-federal-law/
 
Poppaj said:
Lakeview give it up. This is willful ignorance. These dumbasses don't want to understand the distinct differences. If Obama or Biden threw a horseshoe and trump threw a grenade these idiots would swear it was exactly the same thing.
Click to expand...
Laughable, no way Obummer could throw a horseshoe. Too limp wristed, now his wife Micheal, I’m sure, he could throw a mean horseshoe:sarc:​
 
FdxUsmc said:
What about these times? More excuses? My favorite is Bergdahl.
Seven Times the GAO Found the Obama Administration Violated Federal Law | Breitbart
Click to expand...
Uh, pardon me, but did Breitbart and the GAO find that any of these violations were ordered by the White House or Obama? It doesn’t seem to say that. Donald J. Trump was impeached for his own actions, which were deemed clearly an abuse of power and obstruction by a majority vote in the House of Representatives. All the deflection you want to throw out won’t change that fact.
 
Lake View Too said:
Uh, pardon me, but did Breitbart and the GAO find that any of these violations were ordered by the White House or Obama? It doesn’t seem to say that. Donald J. Trump was impeached for his own actions, which were deemed clearly an abuse of power and obstruction by a majority vote in the House of Representatives. All the deflection you want to throw out won’t change that fact.
Click to expand...
:floor:
 
FdxUsmc said:
Proof, :floor:proof hasn’t been involved in this impeachment at all. He will be exonerated in the senate because the proof doesn’t exist:clap:
Click to expand...

It's obvious what Trump did to warrant impeachment. The only dispute, mostly by Republicans in denial, is whether or not to remove him. But that has absolutely nothing to do with the unproven allegations of quid pro quo for personal favor against Joe Biden. Unless you've been living in a cave on a desert isle for the last week, it's become quite clear that exoneration of President* Trump is now out of the question. He cannot be exonerated any more than Bill Clinton was, and Clinton's offenses were trivial by comparison. Trump's only defense is "yeah I did all these things, now what are you going to do about it". He will likely be "acquitted" and those who vote for acquittal will live with the legacy of having wiped their asses with the Constitution.
 
Leader of the Banned said:
It's obvious what Trump did to warrant impeachment. The only dispute, mostly by Republicans in denial, is whether or not to remove him. But that has absolutely nothing to do with the unproven allegations of quid pro quo for personal favor against Joe Biden. Unless you've been living in a cave on a desert isle for the last week, it's become quite clear that exoneration of President* Trump is now out of the question. He cannot be exonerated any more than Bill Clinton was, and Clinton's offenses were trivial by comparison. Trump's only defense is "yeah I did all these things, now what are you going to do about it". He will likely be "acquitted" and those who vote for acquittal will live with the legacy of having wiped their asses with the Constitution.
Click to expand...
If the evidence was overwhelming like you falsely claim, A significant number of Republicans would of voted with the Dems like during the Clinton Impeachment where 31 dems voted with republicans. The is the first, unfortunately I believe it will become common, partisan impeachment.
 
FdxUsmc said:
If the evidence was overwhelming like you falsely claim, A significant number of Republicans would of voted with the Dems like during the Clinton Impeachment where 31 dems voted with republicans. The is the first, unfortunately I believe it will become common, partisan impeachment.
Click to expand...
I just got through telling you that the Republicans are morally bankrupt, corrupt pieces of s**t. What part of that didn't sink in?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter









Share this page




                               
Back
Top