• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Welcome to America

New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why no bribery charge smart guy? I mean, your (nonexistent)evidence is overwhelming:dunno:
Are you disputing that he withheld legally obligated aid payments to Ukraine? The GAO said he did. The DoD said he did. The Office of the Budget said he did. If he has some witness who can prove he didn’t, then I sure do wish they would call him to testify. Don’t you?
 
Last edited:
Tell us Fedx what line would trump have to cross for you to say it was a line too far? Apparently none it seems.
 
The most charitable view of the situation is that [Schiff’s] staff committed the equivalent of Congressional malpractice by not looking more than an inch deep to determine the facts before foisting this erroneous information on his colleagues and the American public. “But given the selective redactions and contextual clues, it seems as though Chairman Schiff sought to portray an innocuous meeting with Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky as an insidious one with the President of Ukraine simply because both of their surnames start with the letter Z.”

BREAKING: New Documents Show Democrat Adam Schiff Mischaracterized Evidence In Impeachment, Report Suggests

Why mischaracterize Evidence if your case is ironclad?
 
Last edited:
The most charitable view of the situation is that [Schiff’s] staff committed the equivalent of Congressional malpractice by not looking more than an inch deep to determine the facts before foisting this erroneous information on his colleagues and the American public. “But given the selective redactions and contextual clues, it seems as though Chairman Schiff sought to portray an innocuous meeting with Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky as an insidious one with the President of Ukraine simply because both of their surnames start with the letter Z.”

BREAKING: New Documents Show Democrat Adam Schiff Mischaracterized Evidence In Impeachment, Report Suggests

Why mischaracterize Evidence if your case is ironclad?
Well, this could be all cleared up if the White House released the full transcript, all other relevant documents, and allowed testimony from key participants in the case. Why prohibit evidence that will exonerate the president*?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top