So who's everyone supporting for 2008?

[BlueFox181]

I wish more than a two-party system was represented at debates.

Give other parties a voice!

 

[Bob]

Ron Paul is an interesting candidate. Don't agree with free trade policies, but he seems the least corrupt of the entire lineup. That means he has no chance. Whoever wins the Repub side will be running against Hillary. Obama and Edwards can't force her into reacting about much of anything.

 

[Smiling JOe]

Ron Paul is an interesting candidate. Don't agree with free trade policies, but he seems the least corrupt of the entire lineup. That means he has no chance. Whoever wins the Repub side will be running against Hillary. Obama and Edwards can't force her into reacting about much of anything.

I wouldn't bet on that one, not even if I were using your money. It is a terrible state we are in when we like choosing a person who is the least corrupt. (They are all corrupt!) That is like being happy if gas prices go back to $2.75 per gallon. It wasn't two years ago when we were all outraged that the gas prices were nearing the two dollar mark per gallon. I think we've come to expect politicians to be crooked, and that in itself, says it all.

 

[LightWorker]

What you think?

 

[Cheering472]

Amen sister.
IMO, we really have some limited choices right now. No one particular candidate right now sparks my interest in the least bit.

I can't see how anyone would want the job to be perfectly honest and step in the poo poo mess Bush is leaving behind.

Not to mention the fact they will be BLAMED for the mess as though they caused it.

 

[6thGen]

someone qualified, for a start. :roll:

how so many americans could have supported a BF moron like Bush (twice) is so beyond me that it makes me not want to care who gets elected. We cannot sink this country any lower if we tried.

but, I'll do my best to care and will be interested in hearing from all of you on the issues, etc.

First "BF"?? No idea. And the rest of your post is woefully unaware of history. Bush isn't the brightest or the best, but he was the best there was at the time. Blame your own party for trotting out someone who couldn't carry his home state and an out of touch NE liberal Senator with zero political instinct to face a very defeatable Bush.

 

[BlueFox181]

 

[Smiling JOe]

 

[Teresa]

First "BF"?? No idea. And the rest of your post is woefully unaware of history. Bush isn't the brightest or the best, but he was the best there was at the time. Blame your own party for trotting out someone who couldn't carry his home state and an out of touch NE liberal Senator with zero political instinct to face a very defeatable Bush.

I am not referring to history. It is my opinion that america elected someone wholly unqualified (twice) and it is my hope that we can do much better in the future. It isn't a historical perspective, it is an opinion. Its based on my observation throughout this adminstration.

If you have some historical perspective you would like to share, then please do so.

Otherwise, its probably best that I ignore your assholiness for now.

 

[sunspotbaby]

I think my avatar speaks for itself. Here is her position on a couple of issues that are facing the gulf coast:

Dig a moat the length of the mexican border.

Use the dirt to raise the levees in New Orleans.

Put all the Florida gators in the moat. We could add sharks too